Saturday, August 15, 2015

The Munster kids are coming to Portland this November!



Butch Patrick and Pat Priest, better known as Eddie and Marilyn Munster back in the 60s, are coming to the Living Dead Horror Convention at the Oregon Convention Center in Portland, OR, this November 13 to 15!

Yep, the youngsters of the Munster family will be in Portland, part of a line up that includes Barbara Steele, Adrienne King and Ari Lehman of the original Friday the 13th, Lisa Marie, Lloyd Kaufman, Joe R. Lansdale and more!  Check back at The Shadow Over Portland for more guest announcements, or visit the official website later for more details.

Oh, and the link will lead you to advanced ticket sales, which will save you a few bucks this month.  Early bird specials end on August 31, so get your tickets now!

Monday, August 10, 2015

Barbara Steele is coming to the Living Dead Horror Convention this November



Oh, those eyes....

With the release of her first horror film, Black Sunday, Barbara Steele was destined to become a queen of horror.  Sure, she could be the screaming damsel in distress, as in The Horrible Dr. Hitchcock, but when she got to play the villain, few were as good, as terrifying, as Steele.

Her role in Roger Corman's Pit and the Pendulum, as a cheating wife attempting to drive her husband (Vincent Price) insane so she can be with another man, is only overshadowed by Price.  Her gloating as she reduces Price into a quivering mass is only match by the fear in her eyes as she realizes what she has unleashed (aided by Price's wonderful transformation).  She's not on the screen long, but she makes the most of it.  And that final shot still sends chills down my spine when I think of it.  Oh yes, those eyes....


Yes, my plan to drive him mad has succeeded.
What could go wrong now?

Steele other film appearances include The Long Hair of Death, Nightmare Castle, The She Beast, Curse of the Crimson Alter (with Christopher Lee and Boris Karloff), Shivers, Piranha (1978) and the 1991 revival of Dark Shadows.  Recent films include The Butterfly Room, Lost River and the animated short, The Mill at Calder's End.

Barbara Steele is scheduled to attend The Living Dead Horror Convention this November 13 through 15 at the Oregon Convention Center in Portland, OR.  Tickets for the event are available at the official website, and early bird prices have been extended to August 31.  Check out the other guest and keep the Halloween Spirit alive well into November at The Living Dead Horror Convention!


Oh yeah, those killer eyes!

Tuesday, August 4, 2015

Halloween continues into November as The Living Dead Horror Convention comes The Oregon Convention Center!



If you're like me, November First is a letdown.  The high of Halloween behind us, Horror Fans have only to look forward to the Sappiest Time of the Year.  A season of glad tidings, peace on Earth and few spooky offerings as everyone celebrates Christmas (or the "war upon it" if you watch Fox News).
But fear not, Horror Fans in the Pacific Northwest!  The First Annual Living Dead Horror Convention  happens November 13 through 15, giving us another chance to spread horrid tidings and creepy cheer.  

And, I'm kicking off my reporting of this convention with the most appropriate guest of all (as the convention starts on Friday the 13th).  The first Final Girl, and Jason's first official kill, Adrianne King, will be attending the festival.  Currently a wine maker in the great Northwest, Adrianne survived Mrs. Voorhees in the classic original, only to be Jason's first confirmed kill in the the sequel.  Talking red wines with Ms. King will take special meanings for fans!


Yeah, talk about clear water all you want, I've been rotting here
for a while!

More information can be found at The Living Dead Horror Convention Site, or Ms. King's Official Site.  And check back to The Shadow Over Portland tomorrow, and I'll spotlight another guest at Portland's First Horror Convention.

Monday, August 3, 2015

H. P. Lovecraft Film Festival and Cthulhu Con guest announcements are up. And I'm a GUEST!



Yes!!!!  I've been invited to be a guest at the 20th Annual H. P. Lovecraft Film Festival and Cthulhu Con on October 2 through 4, at The Hollywood Theatre in Portland, OR, and I am BEYOND delighted.  I'll be part of a list of people including Guest of Honor Charles Stross, Lovecraftian artist Liv Rainey-Smith, local podcasting legend Derek M. Koch, local author Jeff Burk and so many others I'm in awe of....

Oh, and Herbert West himself, Jeffrey Combs is coming!  I've just lost my sanity roll!!



Like he really needs credentials to get into the festival.

Seriously, I am so honored to be part of such a group of Lovecraft scholars and artists.  Words can't express how I feel to be an active part of this, the 20th Anniversary festival.  I've attended this festival for so long, but the opportunity to be an active participate leaves me speechless.

The Kickstarter campaign is active for the next three days, so pledge some money and get some great rewards.  I'll see you there!




Wednesday, June 24, 2015

The Monster That Challenged The World (1957)



Okay, we all know that Herschell Gordon Lewis invented the gore film with his 1963 release, Blood Feast.  But before that, some drive in features were experimenting with gruesome images such as dismemberment, decapitations and, in the case of The Monster That Challenged The World, desiccated corpses.  But, unlike other drive in movies dabbling with gore in the 50s, this film is quite good and hold up well today, despite a rudimentary plot.

Yeah, first we get the long monolog talking about an earthquake near the inland Salton Sea in California.  Though activity on the military base is back to normal a few hours later, a number of Navy personnel and civilians nearby resorts start turning up dead, their bodies drained of all fluids.


Yeah, just what you want washing up on the beaches during the tourist season.


Despite closing the beaches (to the dismay of local resort owners), desiccated corpses pile up at the morgue, until the Navy discovers the culprit, a giant prehistoric snail.

Despite destroying the entrance to it's cave with depth charges, a group of scientists believe the cave was opened by the recent earthquake, unleashing a group of these deadly mollusks.  And, as these creatures can transition from salt to fresh water, and travel across land, the lead scientist believes the snails are heading to a nearby series of rivers that serve as irrigation canals for the area.

Of course, the system leads to the deep blue sea, the ultimate destination of the snails.  Once in the ocean, they will breed unchecked, destroying all marine life and eventually threatening all of humanity as they travel through the waterways of the world.

The Navy, along with the scientists and local police officers, attempt to stop this migration, but are only able to follow a trail of withered corpses left behind by the ravenous mollusks.  One can only hope humanity can stop these monsters before they reach the ocean and breed out of control.


And if pointy sticks are our only option, I think we're screwed.


If you know anything about the giant monster genre of the 50s, you know the humans will prevail. No spoiler warning needed, as the end of the film is about as obvious as the references I made to more recent monster movies in the above paragraphs.  But this film is much better than the summery suggests, thanks in part to a solid script, some well drawn characters and terrific performances from the cast (at least as good as a 16 day shooting schedule).

Let's start with the main character, Lt. Cmdr. John "Twill" Twillinger.  Played by Tim Holt (who's previous credits include a lot of Westerns), Twill is a Navy straight arrow, not hesitant in berating personnel who admit to talking on the radio with fellow enlisted men "like on the phone."  Perfect hard case character, if you were casting someone like James Arness or Peter Graves.

But Holt isn't physically imposing, his character is nice to kids (more on that later) and, as he battles the last of the giant snails with nothing more than a fire extinguisher, he looks about to wet his pants in fright.  That might be a bit of an over-reaction on my part, but he feels more realistic than the square jawed hero facing a giant monster with a steely glare.  Holt is terrific, more human than most scripts would allow their hero to be, and a big reason why the film still works.  And remember, he pulled this off on a 16 day shooting schedule.  Bravo, sir.


Sure, it's nice to think you'd be more like Bruce Campbell.
But this photo is probably more accurate.  

And, as I mentioned it, let's get back to the kids.  Twill attempts to strike up a romance with the pretty secretary in the science lab, Gail MacKenzie (Audrey Dolton, Mr. Sardonicus), a single mother with a young daughter, Sandy (Mimi Gibson).  No big deal now, but remember, this was the 50s, and single parenthood was considered a taboo subject on film thanks to The Hays Code (which required the sanctity of marriage and Christian home life be upheld).

But, in another nice character arc, we learn that Gail is a widow, who's husband died in a military plane test years earlier.  Sure, it stops the film a bit after we get to see the monster for the first time, but it's a well written scene and Dolton does a wonderful job explaining to Twill her past and why she can't comfort another woman who learns her husband died investigating the deaths in the area.

Now this death leads into another interesting bit of scripting (yep, the segues just keep coming!).  As two scientist investigate an underwater cave never charted by previous divers, one is killed by a giant snail.  His diving partner swims away in fear and you might expect him to be the character that doesn't make it to the ending credits, as he has to "pay" for his cowardice actions.


Well, I was going to go back down, but now I think I'll stay up here with your guys.

However, the screenplay by Pat Fielder (The Vampire, The Return of Dracula), based on a story by David Duncan (The Time Machine, The Black Scorpion), refuses to follow the rules and allows this character a bit of redemption during the attack on the snail nesting ground.  And, as Twill looked ready to run away from the final creature in the last minutes of the film, I think the script shows that, in such circumstances, anyone might flee when facing such overwhelming odds.  It's a very human statement, and a refreshing change from the action heroes populating the Giant Monster Genre in the 50s.

And the creatures look amazing.  The effects work by Robert H. Crandall, Ted Haworth (as Edward S. Haworth) and Augie Lohman (as August Lohman) holds up better than most of the CGI work of today, and I'm not just talking Syfy cheese.  The desiccated corpses look great (okay, for the time, but still), and the full sized, PRACTICAL EFFECT snail is jaw dropping, especially during the final moments in the science lab.  You could argue that Harryhausen might have done a better job, but not on a half month shooting schedule.  The effect team delivered some of the best low budget giant monster effects I can think of, including the early works of Bert Gordon and, despite the budget, even rivaling THEM!.

Even as a black and white still, this looks so much better than most
modern monster movies.



Despite homages in Joe Dante's Piranha and Motel Hell, this film seems to be a forgotten classic, and that's a shame.  The Monster That Challenged the World delivers on the important giant monster tropes of the 50s, while the script undercut others as fast as possible.  The actors gave solid performances, despite a short shooting schedule, and the effects team created a monster that holds up against most of the CGI creations on the screen (both big and small).  If you haven't seen it, I seriously suggest checking it out.  I've watched it three times this year and still get lost in the film.  It's deserves to be included with THEM! as one of the best Big Bug (okay, MOLLUSK, quit being so picky) Monster Movies of the 50s.



Okay, and if that review didn't convince you to watch this film, 
here's Barbara Darrow in her few minutes in the movie.

I can't believe I'm sinking this low....

Tuesday, June 16, 2015

Meg might finally come to the big screen, but is it too late?



Okay, I'll admit, I love Steve Alten's Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror.  It's a light, easy summer read, and despite some painfully stereotypical characters, the novel features some terrific sequences as a prehistoric Megalodon emerges from the Mariana Trench to threaten the world.  It's a big ass shark threatening modern man, with some painful soap opera plot lines threaded among intense, and often graphic, action scenes.

The story is perfect for a summer box office thriller, but the property has lingered in development hell since 1997, when the novel was released.  Disney held the rights for a while, but bulked after Deep Blue Sea was released and underperformed.  Budgetary issues were a problem for New Line Cinema, as the film's budget ballooned to $200 million to bring the massive creature to the screen.  Even with Guillermo del Toro and Jan de Bont interested in directing, the film never found a backer.


Yeah, this wouldn't have interested filmgoers at all.


But today, Variety reported that Eli Roth is interested in directing the project and, based on the returns from Jurassic World, backers are coming forward.  And, while the action might take place in China, rather than San Francisco, I'm interested, but wonder if this film is a bit too late to get past the development stage.

Again, I admit to WANTING to see this novel on the screen.  Yes, the characters are horrid stereotypes, including a disgraced 50 year old deep sea diver seeking redemption for the death of his crew at the jaws of a Megalodon, who finds comfort from his domineering wife (also a TV reporter) in the arms of a much younger Asian woman.  And the novel includes another Asian character (father to the hero's new love interest) overlooking the death of his son by the shark and financing the capture of the monster to show to the world for a cost.  Of course, we get all the comeuppance one expects from such a bland novel.


And. come on, this is a moment that would make you wish you were wearing a wetsuit,
as no one would notice your bladder released in the theater.


But oh, the action sequences deserve to be on film.  The confrontation in the trench, the shark's attacks upon the modern world, and....

SPOILERS!

... the hero's final assault on the creature, as he drives his one-man submersible into the shark's stomach, then pushes aside the corpses of it's victims, including his wife, to cut his way to the beast's heart and stabs it to death.  Seriously, this needs to be an R-rated film, so our hero pushes aside mutilated corpses to burrow deep into the Megalodon's innards to rip it's heart apart (with a fossilized, yet razor sharp, Megalodon tooth; irony much?).  Seriously, I want to see this moment on the big screen.

END SPOILERS.

Yeah, I'd pay good money just for that sequence.  If Roth can deliver on that, I'll be first in line for the premiere in Portland.

But I don't think it will happen.

AGAIN, SPOILERS!

First, I don't care how graphic PG-13 movies can be, they can't depict a man swimming through a shark's stomach full of it's recently devoured victims.  We are not talking dismembered arms and legs here, but full torsos bitten in half.  And I don't care how graphic the deaths in Jurassic World are, swimming amongst a stomach full of mauled humans will not garner good will from the MPAA.


And, to be honest, recent PG-13 shark movies suck.


END SPOILERS.

Sure, Roth could deliver on the graphic nature of the finale, but one has to wonder if the backers will balk at such a scene and demand a cleaner ending to the shark, much like previous films.  Which brings me to my second point.

One has to wonder if monster sharks have saturated the small screen to the point that a big screen adaptation won't work.  For starts, we have Shark Attack 3: Megalodon, a rip off of Meg featuring some silly effects involving real great white sharks and imposed victims, and the WORSE PICK UP LINE EVER (Goggle it for yourself).


Laugh all you want, it's still a freaky moment.


And we've had Sharktopus, Mega Shark verses whatever, and a slew of other giant shark films on Syfy.  And, after Sharknado, can any film producer expect people to pay over $10 to see a giant shark movie in the theater without snarky remarks from RiffTrax accompaniment?

I don't think this film will work unless it delivers on the novel's final act.  Roth could pull it off, but it remains to be seen if the film's backers allow it.  If they do, it could be the most gruesome giant shark movie ever, making it a potential classic in my opinion.  But the ending is neutered, it's just another film to catch on cable.

Time will tell.  But I hope the final act of the novel is shown on the screen, because getting a Quint eye view of a monster shark would be worth any admission price.


Dammit!  Where is my submersible?!?!?!?

Monday, April 20, 2015

Why the Poltergeist remake will beat Crimson Peak at the box office, and how Alice Robb explained it.



Last year, Alice Robb wrote about what a horror fan is on The New Republic website, and the article wasn’t flattering.  I posted a response, citing how horror fans could defuse any argument used in the article, should family members, coworkers or acquaintances ask why you are such a monster.

However, two big horror movies hitting theaters this year caused me to think about Robb's article.  First, we have the 3D remake of Poltergeist, hitting theaters on May 22.  Guillermo del Toro’s latest, Crimson Peak, opens on October 16, a more appropriate date for a true horror film. 


Yes, I'm calling this a TRUE HORROR FILM.
I hope I'm not wrong.

You can check out trailers for both films on YouTube.  However, after seeing the trailer for Poltergeist in the theater last week, I was reminded of Robb’s article and why I believe the remake will likely be the bigger box office draw of the two. 

The trailer for Poltergeist was even more sense assaulting in the theater than on a TV or computer monitor, thanks to the big screen and a Dolby Surround Sound system.  Yet, it was also a case of déjà vu for me, as I saw the original when it opened in theaters, and multiple times since then.  Sam Raimi and company could have saved some money by just digitizing the original, as the preview shows nothing fans of the Tobe Hooper/Steven Spielberg version haven’t seen.  Little blonde girl in front of a TV (now a REALLY BIG HD TV) proclaiming, “They’re heeeere,” young boy being menaced by an animated tree, pathways leading to “the other side,” a much taller home exorcist spouting Zelda Rubinstein’s lines almost verbatim, and, of course, a scary clown.


Sorry, but the other clown was scarier.  Even in the trailer.

Seriously, I think the tagline for the film should be a redo of Rubinstein’s line, “It knows what scares you,” only with the new exorcist saying, “It knows what scared audiences in the 80s.  Now it’s ready to do it again, only with CGI effects and LOUDER MUSIC STINGS!!!”

As the trailer closed with the film’s release date, I was reminded of the article on The New Republic site, and Robb’s final assumption about horror fans, that they are males (a point she made earlier in the article) interested in dates that are “distressed women.”  In short, Horror Fans are mostly guys looking for women willing to cling to them in fear.  And, as long as the guys aren’t scared, or at least not as scared as their dates, the women enjoyed the date more (according to the study cited in the article). 

Zits says it better than I could in just four panels.  

Again, I will argue that Horror Fans are not the couples that comprise the study Robb cites in her article, but they will comprise the audience that attends the opening weekend of Poltergeist.  Despite the involvement of Sam Raimi, this film is not targeted at Horror Fans, but an audience eager for cheap jump scares, loud music stings and a reason to huddle/cuddle close in the theater. 

And, I suspect, this is the reason we don’t get many strong, atmospheric and creepy horror films, ones that play on our deeper fears and emotions.  Studios are looking for big openings, horror films that will make back their budget in a couple of days, than pull in home video sales, rather than develop an audience from word of mouth. 

Horror Fans can protest on Facebook, and our blogs (I am counting myself), that horror films can be artistic and scary, but as long as Hollywood sees a bigger box office return from the same cheap, make-the-audience-jump, crap infesting theaters over the past decade, I doubt the strong critical response to films like The Babadook and It Follows will lead to any changes in the films offered up to mainstream audiences. 


Give me a creepy pop-up book and a slow burn over cheap jump scares any day.

Also working against horror films is the tentpole mentality of the major studios.  A Poltergeist sequel is set up in the film’s trailer, as the exorcist proclaims the housing complex was built on a graveyard, but something stronger is present.  Sure, it’s a variation on a line in the original, but given the current cinematic climate, I suggest a CGI tequila vomit-worm will crawl into theaters within a couple years, if the box office returns for Poltergeist are strong enough.


I don't care how good the CGI looks.  It won't match this moment.

Nothing is going to change anytime soon, unless Horror Fans are willing to take a few risks.  We need to support the quirky independent features making it into theaters.  You might like them, or not, but vote with your dollars, Horror Fans.  We need to stop thinking about trying to change the minds of the studio executives and focus on the theater owners, especially local, independent theaters.  If we make a market, such theaters will respond and start booking independently produced horror film for a limited run.  Readers of this blog know independent theaters in Portland are finding box office success with independent horror films, and if other regional independent theaters are successful booking such films, the major studios might start paying attention. 

It’s a long shot, but better than a future of reboots, prequels and classic monsters in a shared, superhero-style universe films coming to a theater near you.



 Now, THAT"S SCARY!

Post Script: I know I've fallen into the trap of judging the Poltergeist remake based on the trailer, but the previews in theaters are suppose to draw us into the film, not repulse us.  Still, I offer my readers this promise.  Barring unforeseen circumstances, I will watch the Poltergeist remake during its opening week and offer an honest review.  As I suspect I will be buying my own ticket (what studio will offer me a preview pass after this article!), but I will likely avoid opening weekend, as I don't want to support what I suspect is a cheap ripoff.  But I will post my honest opinion and really hope I'm wrong concerning my fears about the trailer.  Stay tuned!